Necessity of legal norms: | Interviewee comments (A, M’, M”, R indicate group affiliation) |
---|---|
For opt-out preferential option | [Sub-group M”]. “First of all we had to fight for the legal fundaments, because if you don’t have a legal fundament then in cantons some hospitals would simply refuse to deliver the data, which would then lower our response rate below the international acceptable limit. So, legal, a legal baseline is very important…There is a moral obligation to use data, to improve quality of life of patients, therefore to have good quality data and completeness. It means obligation to have an opt-out...There is a conflict of moral obligation with the data protection officer who wants first to protect individual privacy. That is why a law will help for [name of the clinical registry] registry.” |
As a basis for confidentiality | [Sub-group M’]: “Confidentiality is very important to get that your patient information is given and that the patient is not disappointed. Depends on what you do, I mean, organ transplant recipients everybody knows they are transplanted so there is not that much to hide. With HIV that’s much different. You have more concern in the HIV cohort study.” |
To better define research | [R] [translation] “There is a clear contradiction in the definition of a clinical trial in the law and in the ruling order. As a result, researchers want to take advantage of this…we have recurring discussions on this question, whether it is research or not. And researchers put a lot of energy and intellectual efforts to argue that in this particular concrete case, it is not research.” |
With guidance for implementation | [Sub-group M”] “Well I mean, there is the legislation and so on, but maybe there is probably not enough guidance in practice, that is known by the people who are developing registries and using them.” |
Applied with an idea of prudence | [Sub-group M’] “That’s an ongoing discussion. Because it’s a pain. … if you have a question that is beyond an individual patient’s treatment, basically it’s science. … So my interpretation is that we have to ask for every project for specific approval for the specific question, which is what I am doing...but not everybody in the cohort study is of my opinion and we have heated discussions because it makes a big difference if you have 40 projects running in this cohort study which are scientifically looking at the cohort study and all these 40 need ethical approval or don’t. … you can go through any kind of audit and I know if you don’t have ethical permits you are lost. You are dead before the game even starts; because for a lawyer, if you have no document, you’re dead.” |