This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Early-career researchers’ views on ethical dimensions of patient engagement in research
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 7 June 2017
Accepted: 27 February 2018
Published: 7 March 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia Kingori|
|30 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arnold Eiser|
|21 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Feb 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Feb 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Feb 2018||Editorially accepted|
|7 Mar 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12910-018-0260-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.