Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation

  • Cory E. Goldstein1Email author,
  • Charles Weijer1,
  • Jamie C. Brehaut2,
  • Dean A. Fergusson2,
  • Jeremy M. Grimshaw2,
  • Austin R. Horn1 and
  • Monica Taljaard2
BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201819:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0253-x

Received: 10 November 2017

Accepted: 19 February 2018

Published: 27 February 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Nov 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Evert V. Van Leeuwen
4 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Raffaella Ravinetto
26 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Cory Goldstein
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Cory Goldstein
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
19 Feb 2018 Editorially accepted
27 Feb 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12910-018-0253-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, London, Canada
(2)
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada

Advertisement