This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Ethical implications of digital communication for the patient-clinician relationship: analysis of interviews with clinicians and young adults with long term conditions (the LYNC study)
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 14 August 2017
Accepted: 13 February 2018
Published: 23 February 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|14 Aug 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rouven Porz|
|22 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marcello Ienca|
|18 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Agnieszka Ignatowicz|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Feb 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Agnieszka Ignatowicz|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Feb 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Feb 2018||Editorially accepted|
|23 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12910-018-0250-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.