This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Advance directives as a tool to respect patients’ values and preferences: discussion on the case of Alzheimer’s disease
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 21 March 2017
Accepted: 12 February 2018
Published: 20 February 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Esther Lee Marcus|
|9 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lionel Pazart|
|17 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Suzanne Van De Vathorst|
|24 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Corinna Porteri|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Esther Lee Marcus|
|2 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lionel Pazart|
|6 Feb 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Corinna Porteri|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Feb 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Feb 2018||Editorially accepted|
|20 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12910-018-0249-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.