Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Moral dilemmas and conflicts concerning patients in a vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: shared or non-shared decision making? A qualitative study of the professional perspective in two moral case deliberations

BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201819:10

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0247-8

Received: 6 September 2017

Accepted: 29 January 2018

Published: 22 February 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Sep 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lois Shepherd
20 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leslie Francis
14 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Conny A.M.F.H. Span-Sluyter
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
29 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
22 Feb 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12910-018-0247-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Radboud University Medical Centre, department of primary care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
(2)
Novicare, Professionals in Elderly Care, Best, the Netherlands
(3)
Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
(4)
Joachim en Anna, Centre for Specialized Geriatric Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Advertisement