This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
An update on the “empirical turn” in bioethics: analysis of empirical research in nine bioethics journals
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 4 September 2017
Accepted: 29 January 2018
Published: 7 February 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Sep 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sabine Salloch|
|24 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marcel Mertz|
|24 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Tenzin Wangmo|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sabine Salloch|
|13 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marcel Mertz|
|20 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Tenzin Wangmo|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|7 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12910-018-0246-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.