Combining value of information analysis and ethical argumentation in decisions on participation of vulnerable patients in clinical research
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Aug 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Ashcroft|
|22 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ramesh Aacharya|
|20 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Gert Jan van der Wilt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|5 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12910-018-0245-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.