Skip to content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Combining value of information analysis and ethical argumentation in decisions on participation of vulnerable patients in clinical research

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
19 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Ashcroft
22 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ramesh Aacharya
20 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gert Jan van der Wilt
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
5 Feb 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12910-018-0245-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.