Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Combining value of information analysis and ethical argumentation in decisions on participation of vulnerable patients in clinical research

BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201819:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0245-x

Received: 19 August 2017

Accepted: 29 January 2018

Published: 5 February 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Ashcroft
22 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ramesh Aacharya
20 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gert Jan van der Wilt
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
29 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
5 Feb 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12910-018-0245-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health Evidence (133), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
(2)
Department of Cardiology (616), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
(3)
Council for Public Health and Society, The Hague, The Netherlands

Advertisement