Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Fake facts and alternative truths in medical research

BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201819:4

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0243-z

Received: 15 August 2017

Accepted: 16 January 2018

Published: 27 January 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Harald Schmidt
15 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Lipworth
20 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Shaw
4 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bjørn Hofmann
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Harald Schmidt
9 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Bjørn Hofmann
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
16 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
27 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12910-018-0243-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Institute for the Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Gjøvik, Norway
(2)
Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Advertisement