Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Balancing the local and the universal in maintaining ethical access to a genomics biobank

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luciana Caenazzo
15 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mahsa Shabani
27 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephanie Dyke
15 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - catherine heeney
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mahsa Shabani
22 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephanie Dyke
1 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - catherine heeney
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
18 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0240-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement