This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Balancing the local and the universal in maintaining ethical access to a genomics biobank
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 27 March 2017
Accepted: 18 December 2017
Published: 28 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luciana Caenazzo|
|15 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mahsa Shabani|
|27 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephanie Dyke|
|15 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - catherine heeney|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mahsa Shabani|
|22 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephanie Dyke|
|1 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - catherine heeney|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|28 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12910-017-0240-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.