Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Ethics

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

“Right to recommend, wrong to require”- an empirical and philosophical study of the views among physicians and the general public on smoking cessation as a condition for surgery

BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201819:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0237-2

Received: 9 December 2016

Accepted: 1 December 2017

Published: 8 January 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adrian Carter
13 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kylie Morphett
19 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Joar Björk
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kylie Morphett
24 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Joar Björk
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
1 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
8 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0237-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics (CHE), LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
(2)
Department of Research and Development, Växjö, Sweden

Advertisement