This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
“Right to recommend, wrong to require”- an empirical and philosophical study of the views among physicians and the general public on smoking cessation as a condition for surgery
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 9 December 2016
Accepted: 1 December 2017
Published: 8 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adrian Carter|
|13 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kylie Morphett|
|19 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Joar Björk|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kylie Morphett|
|24 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Joar Björk|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12910-017-0237-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.