Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Participatory improvement of a template for informed consent documents in biobank research - study results and methodological reflections

BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:78

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0232-7

Received: 6 July 2017

Accepted: 27 November 2017

Published: 20 December 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Jul 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - wendy lipworth
11 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Flavio D"Abramo
27 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sabine Bossert
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sabine Bossert
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sabine Bossert
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
20 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0232-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
(2)
MEDIAN Centre for Behavioural Medicine, Bad Pyrmont, Germany
(3)
Hannover Unified Biobank, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

Advertisement