Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Decision-making on therapeutic futility in Mexican adolescents with cancer: a qualitative study

  • 1,
  • 2Email author and
  • 3
BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:74

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0231-8

Received: 21 April 2017

Accepted: 27 November 2017

Published: 11 December 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Anderson
1 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Hain
5 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Carlo Cicero-Oneto
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Carlo Cicero-Oneto
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
27 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
11 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0231-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Haemato-Oncology Department Hospital Infantil de Mexico “Federico Gómez”, National Health Institute of the Secretariat of Health, Mexico City, Mexico
(2)
Health Research Council of the Mexican Institute of Social Security, Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI, Mexico City, Mexico
(3)
Policy Studies Centre of the College of Public Policy, University of Texas in San Antonio, San Antonio Texas, USA

Advertisement