This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Must we remain blind to undergraduate medical ethics education in Africa? A cross-sectional study of Nigerian medical students
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 28 October 2016
Accepted: 22 November 2017
Published: 8 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Musick|
|26 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mary White|
|7 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - ONOCHIE OKOYE|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Musick|
|19 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mary White|
|9 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - ONOCHIE OKOYE|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|8 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12910-017-0229-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.