This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Roles and responsibilities of clinical ethics committees in priority setting
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 22 June 2017
Accepted: 20 November 2017
Published: 1 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gert Jan van der Wilt|
|25 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gert Helgesson|
|5 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Morten Magelssen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Morten Magelssen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|1 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12910-017-0226-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.