Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Ethical considerations in forensic genetics research on tissue samples collected post-mortem in Cape Town, South Africa

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Laura Jane Heathfield
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eman Ali Al Gaai
26 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lorraine du Toit-Prinsloo
28 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Laura Jane Heathfield
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Laura Jane Heathfield
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Laura Jane Heathfield
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
17 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Laura Jane Heathfield
Resubmission - Version 6
17 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
20 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
29 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0225-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement