Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Ethics

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review

BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:65

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0224-7

Received: 3 July 2017

Accepted: 9 November 2017

Published: 28 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Jul 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gert Helgesson
2 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francis Barchi
7 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Samantha Trace
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francis Barchi
21 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gert Helgesson
9 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Samantha Trace
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
9 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0224-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Biomedical and Biomolecular Science, University of Portsmouth

Advertisement