Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Ethics

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Biobanking in Israel 2016–17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment

  • Gideon Koren1, 2Email author,
  • Daniella Beller1,
  • Daphna Laifenfeld3,
  • Iris Grossman3 and
  • Varda Shalev1, 2
BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:63

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0223-8

Received: 13 June 2017

Accepted: 9 November 2017

Published: 17 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ciara Staunton
9 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Meir
15 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gideon Koren
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gideon Koren
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gideon Koren
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
9 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
17 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0223-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Research Institute, Maccabi Health Services
(2)
Tel Aviv University
(3)
Teva Inc

Advertisement