Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Ethics

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

This moral coil: a cross-sectional survey of Canadian medical student attitudes toward medical assistance in dying

  • Eli Xavier Bator1Email author,
  • Bethany Philpott1 and
  • Andrew Paul Costa1
BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:58

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0218-5

Received: 12 April 2017

Accepted: 18 October 2017

Published: 27 October 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
25 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Morten Magelssen
31 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aslihan Akpinar
5 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Eli Bator
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Eli Bator
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
18 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
27 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0218-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Waterloo Regional Campus, McMaster University

Advertisement