This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Collaborative partnership and the social value of clinical research: a qualitative secondary analysis
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 18 December 2016
Accepted: 17 October 2017
Published: 25 October 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Pentz|
|21 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aasim Padela|
|19 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sanna-Maria Nurmi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sanna-Maria Nurmi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|25 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12910-017-0217-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.