This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Informed consent and registry-based research - the case of the Danish circumcision registry
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 18 February 2016
Accepted: 7 September 2017
Published: 15 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Feb 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Allan J. Jacobs|
|4 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Darby|
|30 Jun 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Ploug|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Jun 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Allan J. Jacobs|
|16 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Darby|
|2 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jonathan Ives|
|10 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Ploug|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Ploug|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|29 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|15 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12910-017-0212-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.