Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Informed consent and registry-based research - the case of the Danish circumcision registry

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Feb 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Allan J. Jacobs
4 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Darby
30 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Ploug
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Allan J. Jacobs
16 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Darby
2 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan Ives
10 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Ploug
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Ploug
Resubmission - Version 4
29 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
7 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
15 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0212-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement