This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Ethical issues of informed consent in malaria research proposals submitted to a research ethics committee in Thailand: a retrospective document review
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 23 December 2016
Accepted: 2 August 2017
Published: 14 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Manasse Bambonye|
|27 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia Marshall|
|7 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Pornpimon Adams|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Pornpimon Adams|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|14 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12910-017-0210-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.