This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Healthcare professionals’ and patients’ perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach
- Gabrielle Natalie Samuel†1, 2,
- Sandi Dheensa†3Email author,
- Bobbie Farsides1,
- Angela Fenwick3 and
- Anneke Lucassen3, 4
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 16 August 2016
Accepted: 24 July 2017
Published: 8 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amy DeBaets|
|27 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simon Woods|
|18 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Gabrielle Samuel|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amy DeBaets|
|24 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Gabrielle Samuel|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Gabrielle Samuel|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|8 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12910-017-0207-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.