Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Ethics

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Healthcare professionals’ and patients’ perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach

  • Gabrielle Natalie Samuel1, 2,
  • Sandi Dheensa3Email author,
  • Bobbie Farsides1,
  • Angela Fenwick3 and
  • Anneke Lucassen3, 4
Contributed equally
BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:47

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0207-8

Received: 16 August 2016

Accepted: 24 July 2017

Published: 8 August 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amy DeBaets
27 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simon Woods
18 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Gabrielle Samuel
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amy DeBaets
24 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gabrielle Samuel
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gabrielle Samuel
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
8 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0207-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Brighton and Sussex Medical School
(2)
Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University
(3)
Clinical Ethics and Law, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, South Academic Block
(4)
Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, University Hospitals Southampton Trust

Advertisement