Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Ethics

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Familiar ethical issues amplified: how members of research ethics committees describe ethical distinctions between disaster and non-disaster research

  • Catherine M. Tansey1,
  • James Anderson2, 3,
  • Renaud F. Boulanger1, 4,
  • Lisa Eckenwiler5,
  • John Pringle1,
  • Lisa Schwartz1, 6 and
  • Matthew Hunt7, 8Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:44

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0203-z

Received: 13 January 2017

Accepted: 19 June 2017

Published: 28 June 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hallvard Fossheim
4 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Signe Mezinska
15 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roger Strand
12 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Catherine Tansey
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Catherine Tansey
Resubmission - Version 3
22 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Catherine Tansey
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
19 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0203-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Humanitarian Health Ethics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada and McMaster University
(2)
Department of Bioethics, The Hospital for Sick Children
(3)
University of Toronto
(4)
McGill University Health Centre
(5)
Department of Philosophy & Department of Health Administration and Policy, George Mason University
(6)
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University
(7)
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University
(8)
Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation

Advertisement