Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparative effectiveness research: what to do when experts disagree about risks

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rieke Van Der Graaf
23 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nathan Emmerich
26 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Ashcroft
7 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Reidar Lie
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Ashcroft
14 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nathan Emmerich
22 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rieke Van Der Graaf
7 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Reidar Lie
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
8 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
19 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0202-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement