This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Ethics review of studies during public health emergencies - the experience of the WHO ethics review committee during the Ebola virus disease epidemic
© World Health Organization; 2017
Received: 14 September 2016
Accepted: 8 June 2017
Published: 26 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Phaikyeong Cheah|
|5 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bridget Haire|
|14 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - SEEMA SHAH|
|16 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Emilie Alirol|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Emilie Alirol|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Emilie Alirol|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|26 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12910-017-0201-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.