Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Ethics review of studies during public health emergencies - the experience of the WHO ethics review committee during the Ebola virus disease epidemic

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Phaikyeong Cheah
5 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bridget Haire
14 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - SEEMA SHAH
16 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Emilie Alirol
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Emilie Alirol
Resubmission - Version 3
9 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Emilie Alirol
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
26 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0201-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement