Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Are advance directives helpful for good end of life decision making: a cross sectional survey of health professionals

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James A. Anderson
11 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simon Jenkins
8 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Aurelija Blazeviciene
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James A. Anderson
31 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simon Jenkins
23 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Aurelija Blazeviciene
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Aurelija Blazeviciene
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
15 May 2017 Editorially accepted
5 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0197-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement