Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Ethics

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Self-tests for influenza: an empirical ethics investigation

BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:33

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0192-y

Received: 19 January 2017

Accepted: 22 April 2017

Published: 5 May 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan Ives
19 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandi Dheensa
4 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Benedict Rumbold
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
22 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
5 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0192-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Philosophy, University College London
(2)
LSE Health and Social Care, Cowdray House, London School of Economics and Political Science

Advertisement