Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Staff’s normative attitudes towards coercion: the role of moral doubt and professional context—a cross-sectional survey study

BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:37

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0190-0

Received: 23 September 2016

Accepted: 22 April 2017

Published: 25 May 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tilman Steinert
26 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jakov Gather
1 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bert Molewijk
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
22 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
25 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0190-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
(2)
Department Medical Humanities, EMGO+, VU University medical centre (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(3)
Department Epidemiology & Biostatistics, EMGO+, VU University medical centre (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(4)
Institute for Studies of the Medical Profession, Oslo, Norway

Advertisement