Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The elusive ideal of inclusiveness: lessons from a worldwide survey of neurologists on the ethical issues raised by whole-genome sequencing

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Thierry Hurlimann
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sangeetha Paramasivan
14 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jalayne Arias
17 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Thierry Hurlimann
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
4 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
11 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0187-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement