Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Ethics

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The elusive ideal of inclusiveness: lessons from a worldwide survey of neurologists on the ethical issues raised by whole-genome sequencing

BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0187-8

Received: 1 September 2016

Accepted: 4 April 2017

Published: 11 April 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Thierry Hurlimann
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sangeetha Paramasivan
14 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jalayne Arias
17 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Thierry Hurlimann
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
4 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
11 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0187-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institut de recherche en santé publique (IRSPUM), Omics-Ethics Research Group, University of Montreal

Advertisement