Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A qualitative study of participants’ views on re-consent in a longitudinal biobank

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kieran O'Doherty
9 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jodyn Platt
21 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Merle Spriggs
20 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Mary Dixon-Woods
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mary Dixon-Woods
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mary Dixon-Woods
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mary Dixon-Woods
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
27 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
23 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0182-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement