This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
“I passed the test!” Evidence of diagnostic misconception in the recruitment of population controls for an H3Africa genomic study in Cape Town, South Africa
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 13 October 2016
Accepted: 8 February 2017
Published: 15 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Knerr|
|22 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dana Mahr|
|15 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Francis Masiye|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Francis Masiye|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|15 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12910-017-0175-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.