This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 4 August 2016
Accepted: 27 January 2017
Published: 2 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Craig Purshouse|
|17 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jose Miola|
|27 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jacklyn Yek|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|2 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12910-017-0172-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.