Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Beyond cultural stereotyping: views on end-of-life decision making among religious and secular persons in the USA, Germany, and Israel

BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:13

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0170-4

Received: 28 June 2016

Accepted: 24 January 2017

Published: 17 February 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Hain
15 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reidun Førde
7 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Mark Schweda
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mark Schweda
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
24 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
17 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0170-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen
(2)
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
(3)
Department of Philosophy, San Francisco State University

Advertisement