This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Ethical framework for the detection, management and communication of incidental findings in imaging studies, building on an interview study of researchers’ practices and perspectives
- Eline M. Bunnik1Email author,
- Lisa van Bodegom1,
- Wim Pinxten2,
- Inez D. de Beaufort†1 and
- Meike W. Vernooij†3, 4
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 15 September 2016
Accepted: 19 January 2017
Published: 6 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|15 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ariel Cascio|
|2 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Berkman|
|14 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Eline Bunnik|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Eline Bunnik|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12910-017-0168-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.