This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Dynamic Consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research
- Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne1, 2Email author,
- Harriet J. A. Teare3,
- Jane Kaye3,
- Stephan Beck4,
- Heidi Beate Bentzen1, 2, 5,
- Luciana Caenazzo6,
- Clive Collett7,
- Flavio D’Abramo8,
- Heike Felzmann9,
- Teresa Finlay3,
- Muhammad Kassim Javaid10,
- Erica Jones4,
- Višnja Katić11,
- Amy Simpson12 and
- Deborah Mascalzoni13, 14
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 9 June 2016
Accepted: 26 December 2016
Published: 25 January 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Pentz|
|2 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Connie M. Ulrich|
|30 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Pentz|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Dec 2016||Editorially accepted|
|25 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12910-016-0162-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.