Table 4 Experiences with various methods for ethics discussions and their suitability
From: The Norwegian national project for ethics support in community health and care services
Methods | Experience with the method (% of all respondents, N = 217) | Method currently in use at workplace (% of respondents with experience with the activity) | Method thought to be well suited (% of respondents with experience with the activity) |
|---|---|---|---|
Unstructured/free reflection | 167 (77 %) | 133 (80 %) | 84 (50 %) |
CME 6-step model | 125 (58 %) | 107 (86 %) | 86 (69 %) |
Ethics cards | 107 (49 %) | 62 (58 %) | 63 (59 %) |
Other discourse ethics model | 51 (24 %) | 26 (51 %) | 24 (47 %) |
”Traffic light” method | 39 (18 %) | 13 (33 %) | 14 (36 %) |
”Fish bowl” method | 30 (14 %) | 11 (37 %) | 17 (57 %)a |