Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Ethics

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

  • Mhairi Aitken1Email author,
  • Jenna de St. Jorre1,
  • Claudia Pagliari1,
  • Ruth Jepson2 and
  • Sarah Cunningham-Burley1
BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:73

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0153-x

Received: 17 June 2016

Accepted: 27 October 2016

Published: 10 November 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
27 Oct 2016 Editorially accepted
10 Nov 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12910-016-0153-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Medical School
(2)
The Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research (SCPHRP)

Advertisement