Skip to content


BMC Medical Ethics

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Research in disaster settings: a systematic qualitative review of ethical guidelines

  • Signe Mezinska1,
  • Péter Kakuk2,
  • Goran Mijaljica3,
  • Marcin Waligóra4 and
  • Dónal P. O’Mathúna5Email author
BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:62

Received: 25 June 2016

Accepted: 14 October 2016

Published: 21 October 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
25 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Oct 2016 Editorially accepted
21 Oct 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12910-016-0148-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia
Department of Behavioural Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen
Department of Medical Humanities, University of Split School of Medicine
Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, REMEDY, Research Ethics in Medicine Study Group, Jagiellonian University Medical College
School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University