Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Ethics

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Disclosing neuroimaging incidental findings: a qualitative thematic analysis of health literacy challenges

  • Caitlin E. Rancher1,
  • Jody M. Shoemaker1,
  • Linda E. Petree1,
  • Mark Holdsworth2,
  • John P. Phillips3 and
  • Deborah L. Helitzer4Email author
BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:58

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0141-1

Received: 22 April 2016

Accepted: 27 September 2016

Published: 11 October 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Apr 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
27 Sep 2016 Editorially accepted
11 Oct 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12910-016-0141-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Mind Research Network
(2)
College of Pharmacy, The University of New Mexico Health Science Center
(3)
Department of Neurology, The University of New Mexico
(4)
College of Population Health, MSC 09-5070 Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico

Advertisement