This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
If you build it, they will come: unintended future uses of organised health data collections
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 18 December 2015
Accepted: 25 August 2016
Published: 6 September 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - I. Glenn Cohen|
|20 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gert Helgesson|
|4 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zubin Master|
|5 Jul 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Kieran C O'Doherty|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Jul 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Aug 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Kieran C O'Doherty|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Aug 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Aug 2016||Editorially accepted|
|6 Sep 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12910-016-0137-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.