This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Has the biobank bubble burst? Withstanding the challenges for sustainable biobanking in the digital era
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 23 December 2015
Accepted: 14 June 2016
Published: 12 July 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|23 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aaron Goldenberg|
|23 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nanibaa' Garrison|
|3 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Don Chalmers|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Jun 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Don Chalmers|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Jun 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Jun 2016||Editorially accepted|
|12 Jul 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12910-016-0124-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.