Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Steps toward improving ethical evaluation in health technology assessment: a proposed framework

  • Nazila Assasi1, 2Email author,
  • Jean-Eric Tarride1, 2,
  • Daria O’Reilly1, 2 and
  • Lisa Schwartz1, 3
BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:34

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0118-0

Received: 1 December 2015

Accepted: 25 May 2016

Published: 6 June 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Dec 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Resnik
6 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bjørn Hofmann
4 Apr 2016 Author responded Author comments - Nazila Assasi
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Apr 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bjørn Hofmann
10 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Nazila Assasi
Resubmission - Version 3
10 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
25 May 2016 Editorially accepted
6 Jun 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12910-016-0118-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
(2)
Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH), St Joseph’s Healthcare, Hamilton, Canada
(3)
Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

Advertisement