This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Steps toward improving ethical evaluation in health technology assessment: a proposed framework
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 1 December 2015
Accepted: 25 May 2016
Published: 6 June 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Resnik|
|6 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bjørn Hofmann|
|4 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Nazila Assasi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bjørn Hofmann|
|10 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Nazila Assasi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 May 2016||Editorially accepted|
|6 Jun 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12910-016-0118-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.