This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 18 December 2015
Accepted: 23 May 2016
Published: 4 June 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Barbara Prainsack|
|24 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nathan Emmerich|
|25 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - John Patrick Woolley|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - John Patrick Woolley|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 May 2016||Editorially accepted|
|4 Jun 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12910-016-0117-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.