This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Controversies surrounding continuous deep sedation at the end of life: the parliamentary and societal debates in France
© Raus et al. 2016
Received: 7 October 2015
Accepted: 16 May 2016
Published: 29 June 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ruth Horn|
|23 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Veronique Fournier|
|7 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Kasper Raus|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Kasper Raus|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 May 2016||Editorially accepted|
|29 Jun 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12910-016-0116-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.