Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Heed or disregard a cancer patient’s critical blogging? An experimental study of two different framing strategies

  • Niels Lynøe1Email author,
  • Sara NattochDag2,
  • Magnus Lindskog3 and
  • Niklas Juth1
BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:30

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0115-3

Received: 11 September 2015

Accepted: 11 May 2016

Published: 20 May 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amy Brown
8 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cathy Ure
31 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Niels Lynoe
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Niels Lynoe
Resubmission - Version 3
3 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Niels Lynoe
Resubmission - Version 4
9 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
11 May 2016 Editorially accepted
20 May 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12910-016-0115-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
(2)
Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
(3)
Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Advertisement