Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Heed or disregard a cancer patient’s critical blogging? An experimental study of two different framing strategies

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amy Brown
8 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cathy Ure
31 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Niels Lynoe
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Niels Lynoe
Resubmission - Version 3
3 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Niels Lynoe
Resubmission - Version 4
9 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
11 May 2016 Editorially accepted
20 May 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12910-016-0115-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement