Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evaluation of moral case deliberation at the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate: a pilot study

  • Wike Seekles1, 3Email author,
  • Guy Widdershoven1,
  • Paul Robben2, 4,
  • Gonny van Dalfsen2 and
  • Bert Molewijk1, 5
BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:31

Received: 13 April 2016

Accepted: 11 May 2016

Published: 21 May 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
13 Apr 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 May 2016 Editorially accepted
21 May 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12910-016-0114-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
The Health Care Inspectorate (IGZ), Utrecht, The Netherlands
University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Centre of Medical Ethics, HELSAM, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway