Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Ethics

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinical decision-making and secondary findings in systems medicine

BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:32

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0113-5

Received: 13 December 2015

Accepted: 10 May 2016

Published: 21 May 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Dec 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brent Mittelstadt
26 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alex McKeown
26 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Tobias Fischer
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Apr 2016 Author responded Author comments - Tobias Fischer
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Apr 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
10 May 2016 Editorially accepted
21 May 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12910-016-0113-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University Medicine Greifswald, Institute for Ethics and History of Medicine
(2)
Kosair Charities Pediatric Clinical Research Unit, University of Louisville, School of Medicine
(3)
Faculty of Theology, Greifswald University

Advertisement