This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Ethical issues in using Twitter for population-level depression monitoring: a qualitative study
© Mikal et al. 2016
Received: 22 October 2015
Accepted: 6 April 2016
Published: 14 April 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wassim Ahmed|
|21 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Diana Borsa|
|22 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jude Mikal|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jude Mikal|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Apr 2016||Editorially accepted|
|14 Apr 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12910-016-0105-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.