Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Ethical issues in using Twitter for population-level depression monitoring: a qualitative study

BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:22

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0105-5

Received: 22 October 2015

Accepted: 6 April 2016

Published: 14 April 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Oct 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wassim Ahmed
21 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Diana Borsa
22 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Jude Mikal
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Apr 2016 Author responded Author comments - Jude Mikal
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Apr 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
6 Apr 2016 Editorially accepted
14 Apr 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12910-016-0105-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, USA
(2)
Department of Family Medicine & Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, USA
(3)
Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA

Advertisement