Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Ethical issues in using Twitter for population-level depression monitoring: a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Oct 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wassim Ahmed
21 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Diana Borsa
22 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Jude Mikal
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Apr 2016 Author responded Author comments - Jude Mikal
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Apr 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
6 Apr 2016 Editorially accepted
14 Apr 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12910-016-0105-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement