Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Moral and social reasons to acknowledge the use of cognitive enhancers in competitive-selective contexts

BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:18

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0102-8

Received: 15 September 2015

Accepted: 22 March 2016

Published: 29 March 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Veljko Dubljevic
17 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Blanca Rodriguez Lopez
4 Jan 2016 Author responded Author comments - Mirko Garasic
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Jan 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Feb 2016 Author responded Author comments - Mirko Garasic
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Feb 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Mirko Garasic
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
22 Mar 2016 Editorially accepted
29 Mar 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12910-016-0102-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
(2)
Centro Universitario Internazionale, Arezzo, Italy

Advertisement